I have been getting a lot of responses to my article in the newsletter and on the website a few weeks ago regarding the current state of cabaret and the need for action on the part of all to support this art form.
One person reminded me of the time when live entertainment venues were closing all over town, with the owners converting their clubs to discos - even THE DUPLEX was converted to a disco for a few years. Fortunately that period was short lived, but the number of live entertainment venues never recovered to its former numbers. Then there was the "comedy club conversion" - venue owners discovered that they could do away with a lot of staff and expense by simply setting a mic in front of a brick wall and a simple spotlight, and get the comic-want-to-be's to fill their rooms by requiring them to bring a minimum number of paying guests in order to get a chance to perform. A lot of this still goes on today - ever notice the kids in the Times Square area handing out discount fliers for this comedy club or that one? The fliers are marked with the comic's code and he is credited with how many actually show up and pay the cover. CAROLINES started out as a cabaret room!
Another e-mail writer blames the clubs and club owners for allowing anyone - good or bad - to present a show as long as they can fill the room. Folks attending a cabaret show for the first time are "turned off" to cabaret when they get suckered into these events by their friends and family.
Or take this one: The so-called major clubs have become dominated by big names from TV, film or Broadway (many of whom are not even known as vocalists), and there is no longer an incentive for cabaret performers to strive to "move up" since they feel they are locked in to the middle-tier rooms. So they get discouraged and drop out of the cabaret scene. And the whole of cabaret is left with lesser skilled and lesser experienced performers.
Here's another complaint: No one seems to set any guidelines for cover charges any more. One could usually get an indication of the skill level of a performer by the cover charge, but it seems like performers are free to charge whatever cover they wish - with debut, inexperienced performers sometimes putting on shows in the $25-$30 range. This creates some real anger and disappointment on the part of the person who feels he didn't get decent value for his cover fee, and all of cabaret gets tainted. And is a $60 to $150 cover (and usually accompanied by a $40 to $60 minimum) seem realistic for a 55 minute show?
The same could be said of the progressively higher minimums charged by the venues and the steadily increasing price of drinks. Some clubs seem to be taking their pricing cues from the "posh" celebrity clubs catering to the "stretched white Hummer" crowd.
Another complaint I have heard is the practice of clubs to cancel a show and still charge a fee if there are less than a certain number of reservations on the book (lately that number has climbed to 15 in some instances). The performer is left holding the bag - absorbing all the costs of creating, producing, advertising and staffing a show, while the venue is in a win-win situation. The musicians usually need to be paid whether there is a show or not, and the cost of arrangements, post cards, fliers, posters, is money down the drain. As one person wrote me, this means the good performer trying to build a career is frightened off, while to lesser performer with a rich benefactor/spouse and a lot of similarly wealthy friends gets the good dates. This drags down the quality of the art.
And - a little closer to home - one person felt that the cabaret reviews he found often bore no resemblance to the quality of the actual show. He felt there was a reluctance on the part of publications/websites to give a bad review of a bad show. And this, coupled with the raves of friends and relatives on the message boards and yahoo/google group mailings, often led to high expectations and total disappointment.
It is interesting to note that not one e-mail was received blaming the recent apparent drop in cabaret attendance on the economy! Maybe that was a foregone conclusion, but interesting just the same.
More comments anyone? I'm listening.
HUGS
STU
